Diaz

(PC) Bland v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20201:20-cv-00895California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00895-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DISMISS ACTION

R. DIAZ, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge

Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 5.) Because Plaintiff has three “strikes” under section 1915(g) and fails to show that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Court recommends that his application be denied and this action dismissed. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs in forma pauperis proceedings. The statute provides, “[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action … under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.