(PS) Meyers v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20202:16-cv-01121California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLEN MEYERS, No. 2:16-CV-01121-MCE-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, Defendants. 16 On July 7, 2020, this court ordered attorney Dennise Henderson to show cause within fourteen days why she should not be sanctioned for violating this court’s orders and the Local Rules by filing documents on behalf of a pro se plaintiff. ECF No. 64. Henderson failed to respond to the July 7, 2020 show cause order. Accordingly, for the reasons below, the court finds as follows: I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On July 18, 2018, attorneys Dennise Henderson and Stratton Barbee were terminated as plaintiff’s counsel of record. ECF Nos. 23, 24. One and a half years later, on January 8, 2020, a response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment was purportedly filed on behalf of plaintiff. ECF No. 50. The response was electronically filed using Barbee’s CM/ECF login and password, and it included a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.