Fortune

(PC) Ramirez v. Fortune

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 24, 20201:19-cv-00746California2,980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE A. RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-00746-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND

FORTUNE, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (ECF No. 16) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 I. Background Plaintiff Jose A. Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 21, 2020, the Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a third amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 16.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that the failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order would result in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.