Schmitt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN TOBEY et al., No. 2:20-cv-00477-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

RICK SCHMITT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against defendants alleging “false advertisement of services, defamation of character, [and] discrimination of disabled persons” and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The court granted plaintiffs’ IFP request and dismissed the complaint. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiffs were given 21 days to amend and were warned that a failure to do so by the required deadline “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including potential dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” More than 21 days have passed without a response from plaintiffs. Eastern District Local Rule 183(a) provides, in part:

Any individual representing himself [] without an attorney…