Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY LANGLEY, Case No. 1:16-cv-01299-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

E. GARCIA; G. COOK, (Doc. 52)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF

17 (Doc. 56) 18 Randy Langley alleges Deputy Garcia and Deputy Cook subjected him to excessive force in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. (Doc. 17.) Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 52.) Defendants argue summary judgment is appropriate because the uncontested facts show they did not use excessive force against Plaintiff and they are entitled to qualified immunity. (Doc. 52-1.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion (Doc. 54), to which Defendants have filed a reply (Doc. 55).1 For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that…