(PC) Davis v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEROME MARKIEL DAVIS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00832-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., (ECF No. 40) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Jerome Markiel Davis (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds 19 against Defendant Roberts in her individual capacity for deliberate indifference in violation of the 20 Eighth Amendment, arising from the alleged incident of food tampering. 21 On June 22, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 40.) In the 22 motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 23 summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 24 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411–12 (9th…