(PS) Conerly v. Kaiser Permanente

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CONERLY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-2535 JAM DB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SHARIF TARPIN, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs James Conerly, Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, Carina Conerly, and M.T. are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 32, 35, 39, 43, 60, 64), defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 63), and plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 42, 62, 65.) For the reasons explained below, defendants’ motions to dismiss are granted, plaintiffs’ motions for default judgment denied, and plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on December 17, 2019, by filing a complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) The…