(PC)Banuelos

(PC)Banuelos v. Aguilar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20201:20-cv-00045California621 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT BANUELOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00045-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE

A. AGUILAR, 14-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge

16 On April 23, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading. (Doc. 7.) On May 11, 2020, the U.S. Postal Service returned the screening order as undeliverable. To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court or responded to the screening order. As explained in the Court’s first informational order, parties appearing pro se must keep the Court advised of their current address. (Doc. 3 at 5.) Pursuant to Local Rules, if mail directed to a pro se plaintiff at his address of record is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and the plaintiff fails to update his address…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.