(SS) Burdine v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20201:19-cv-00518California6,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

19 Plaintiff LaToya Lashon Burdine (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the final decision 20 of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her 21 application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II, and supplemental security income 22 pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the 23 parties’ briefs which were submitted without oral argument to the Honorable Gary S. Austin, 24 United States Magistrate Judge. See Docs. 15, 17 and 18. Having reviewed the record as a 25 whole, the Court finds that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and applicable 26 law. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s appeal is denied.

1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge. See Docs. 7 and 8. II. Procedural Background On November 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income alleging disability beginning November 4, 2014. AR 15. The Commissioner denied the application initially on August 12, 2015, and following reconsideration on March 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.