(HC) Yocom v. Attorney General

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20201:20-cv-00645California891 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. YOCOM, No. 1:20-cv-00645-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

ATTORNEY GENERAL, (Doc. No. 30) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Michael A. Yocom is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 30)1 of the undersigned’s July 1, 2020 order adopting (Doc. No. 28) the assigned magistrate judge’s June 5, 2020 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 18). In that order, the court dismissed petitioner’s petition for federal habeas relief because petitioner’s direct appeal of his state court judgment of conviction is still pending before the state appellate court. (Doc. No. 28.) The court dismissed the federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.