Moore

(PC) Revis v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20201:19-cv-00034California2,738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE L. REVIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00034-DAD-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

THIRD SCREENING ORDER

v. (Doc. 23) S. SHERMAN, et al.,

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Andre L. Revis alleges the defendants denied him a kosher diet in violation of the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. (Doc. 23.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s third amended complaint1 fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Because Plaintiff may be able to cure the deficiencies in his pleading, the Court grants him one final opportunity to amend his complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.