Aung

(PC) Murray v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20202:19-cv-02114California3,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY MURRAY, No. 2:19-cv-2114 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The complaint seeks a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. ECF No. 1. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.