Stevenson

(PC) Vis v. Stevenson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20202:20-cv-00987California1,284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTOPHER VIS, No. 2:20-cv-0987 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STEVENSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On screening plaintiff’s complaint, this court found plaintiff stated no claims cognizable under § 1983. Plaintiff was given the opportunity to file an amended complaint. (See ECF No. 4.) Since then, plaintiff has filed three documents with this court. In the first document, plaintiff appears to be seeking this court’s intervention in decisions made to medicate him and finding him incompetent. (ECF No. 6.) Second, plaintiff again complains about these decisions and states that he will amend his complaint to allege human trafficking. (ECF No. 7.) In the third filing, plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 8.) MOTION TO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.