(PS) Pierson v. Sutter Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III, No. 2:20-cv-00124-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUTTER HEALTH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raymond H. Pierson, III (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 20.) On July 16, 2020, Plaintiff requested additional time to file his objections, which the magistrate judge granted. (ECF Nos. 27, 28.) On July 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 31), as well as a “motion to invalidate claim of service” (ECF No. 24) —…