(PC) Murphy v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20201:19-cv-00206California790 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN PAUL JONES MURPHY, No. 1:19-cv-00206-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

R. RODRIGUEZ, et al., (Doc. No. 47 at 15) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff John Paul Jones Murphy is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 14, 2020, the court adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 19) and allowed this case to proceed “only on plaintiff’s claims against defendant Amobi for deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights and against defendants Sanchez, Rodriguez, Vang, and Aguirre for negligence and for failure to protect in violation of plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights.” (Doc. No. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.