Scanlon
Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROMAN SCANLON, on behalf of himself, No. 1:19-cv-00937-NONE-SKO the general public, and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL
v. (Doc. 44) CURTIS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,
Defendant. 15 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Roman Scanlon’s motion to compel, filed June 18, 2020 (“Motion to Compel”). (Doc. 44.) Plaintiff and Defendant Curtis International, Ltd. (“Curtis”) filed their “Joint Statement” directed to the Motion to Compel, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on July 15, 2020. (Doc. 47.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The hearing set for July 22, 2020, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 48.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Compel will be granted in part, subject to the limitations set forth below. …