Torrance

(PS) United States of America v. Torrance

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20202:18-cv-01631California367 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:18-cv-1631-JAM-EFB PS Petitioner, v. ORDER BRIAN TORRANCE, Respondent. 16 On April 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Respondent filed objections on July 6, 2020, and petitioner filed a response to the objections on July 21, 2020. Both filings were considered by the undersigned.1 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court

Within his objections, respondent requests he be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.