(PC) Baker v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20202:19-cv-02617California1,627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY RAY BAKER, No. 2:19-CV-2617-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 2). 20 I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint. Plaintiff names the following as defendants: (1) J. Lynch; (2) J. Howard; (3) J. Frederick; (4) D. Roth; (5) M. Hontz; and (6) A.W. Peterson. See ECF No. 1, pg. 1. According to plaintiff, the events giving rise to the complaint occurred at California State Prison – Sacramento (CSP-Sac.). See id. Plaintiff presents three claims. / / / / / / In his first claim, plaintiff alleges defendant J. Howard wrote a racially biased “Informational Chrono” which contained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.