(PC)Ramos

(PC)Ramos v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20202:20-cv-00971California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO RAMOS, Jr., No. 2: 20-cv-0971 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendants. 16 By an order filed June 19, 2020, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a properly completed in forma pauperis application and a certified copy of his trust account. The thirty days period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.