Scoggin

Scoggin v. Turning Point Central California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20201:20-cv-00140California2,212 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANELLE RENEE SCOGGIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00140-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF,

TURNING POINT CENTRAL FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

CALIFORNIA, FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDERS

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 10, 15)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN TWENTY-

ONE DAYS

17 Danelle Renee Scoggin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on January 28, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On March 27, 2020, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was found not to state a cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.