Garry

(PC) Driver v. Garry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20202:20-cv-00800California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2:20-cv-0800 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. GARRY, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that (1) plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and (2) plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee prior to proceeding any further with this action. I. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g): Three Strikes Rule 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) states: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.