Lee v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVAN S. LEE, No. 2:17-cv-118-JAM-EFB PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 16 This case was before the court on May 27, 2020, for hearing on defendant’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement (ECF No. 54) and plaintiff’s motion to set aside the settlement agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) (ECF No. 57). Senior Deputy City Attorney Kathleen Rogan appeared on behalf of defendant; plaintiff appeared pro se. For the reasons explained below, it is recommended defendant’s motion be granted and plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. Defendant’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement A. Background Plaintiff Ivan Lee, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action against his former employer, defendant City of Sacramento, in the California Superior Court for the County of Sacramento. ECF No. 1 at 4-7. After defendant removed this…