Brooke

Brooke v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20201:20-cv-00101California3,329 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00101-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND THE

v. COMPLAINT

JAVANTILAL M. PATEL, doing business as (Doc. 17) Home2 Suites by Hilton Hanford Lemoore, et al., Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Theresa Brooke’s motion to amend complaint, filed June 11, 2020. (Doc. 17.) Defendants Javantilal M. Patel and Anand Hospitality, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) filed an opposition brief on July 1, 2020. (Doc. 18.) That same day, Plaintiff filed a reply brief (Doc. 20), and on July 6, 2020, Defendants filed objections to evidence submitted with Plaintiff’s reply (Doc. 21). After having reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material, the matter was deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the hearing was vacated on July 13, 2020. (Doc. 22.) For the reasons set forth below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.