Crounse

(PC) Rouser v. Crounse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20201:19-cv-00550California3,582 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM ROUSER, 1:19-cv-00550-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

vs. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 8(a) AND FAILURE TO D. CROUNSE, et al., STATE A § 1983 CLAIM, WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND

(ECF No. 1.) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

18 I. BACKGROUND William Rouser (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 22, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action in the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On April 29, 2019, the case was transferred to this court. (ECF No. 6.) The Complaint is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.