Daszko

(PC) Tucker v. Daszko

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20202:17-cv-01798California276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCELLIOUS TUCKER, No. 2:17-cv-1798 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JAROM A. DASZKO, M.D., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. By an order filed May 15, 2020, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on the sole remaining defendant, Dr. Daszko. That sixty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.