Petersen

(PC) Davis v. Petersen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20202:19-cv-02130California293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIM DALE DAVIS, No. 2:19-cv-2130 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND KIM PETERSON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On March 16, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline for doing so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case, and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.