(HC) Barnes v. California Department Corrections Director

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20201:20-cv-00836California2,188 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00836-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER VACATING JUNE 23, 2020

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. ECF No. 9 HANFORD SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE

ROBERTS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO Respondent. EXHAUST CLAIMS AND TO DENY REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS ECF Nos. 1, 13 19 Petitioner Antoine Barnes, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Petitioner argues, in two related claims, that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment when it failed to award him certain custody credits under California law. Id. at 3-4. This matter is before us for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.