Ribera

(PC) Vanzuylen v. Ribera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20201:20-cv-00057California2,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR VANZUYLEN, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0057 DAD JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A RESPONSE

v. (Doc. 1)

A. RIBERA, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental employees 17 and/or entities. (Doc. 1.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates 18 seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised 20 claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be 21 granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, 23 the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.