Yarmolyuk

(PC) Ilsung v. Yarmolyuk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20202:20-cv-00033California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VICTORY ILSUNG, No. 2:20-cv-0033-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

YARMOLYUK, et. al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 13, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 9. As with the original complaint, the court dismissed the complaint, explained the deficiencies therein, and granted plaintiff thirty days in which to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies. Id. The screening order warned plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Despite a sua sponte extension of time granted to plaintiff (ECF No. 11), the time for acting has now passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.