Vance

(PS) Velez v. Vance

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 31, 20202:19-cv-02409California446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSE VELEZ, No. 2:19-cv-2409-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TAMMY VANCE, FRANCISCO

BOBADILLA, DEMETRIO NIEVES

CORTES, HILARIO VELAZQUEZ, DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff filed this action against four defendants, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. ECF No. 1. After defendant Tammy Vance filed an answer to the complaint, plaintiff filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice. ECF No. 5. Thereafter, Vance—the only defendant to have appeared in this action—was ordered to file, by no later than May 14, 2020, a document stipulating to the dismissal of this action, or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s request for dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) (an action may be dismissed without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal prior to a defendant serving an answer or by stipulation signed by all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.