Pottorff

Pottorff v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20201:16-cv-01593California10,970 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN POTTORFF, No. 1:16-cv-01593-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 28) 16 17 INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendants, which are the City of Fresno; Jerry Dyer, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Fresno; and Daniel Gonzalez, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for the City of Fresno (collectively, “defendants”). On November 19, 2019, the motion came before the court for hearing. Attorney Justin Dennis Harris appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff, and attorney Bruce Daniel Praet appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. For the reasons discussed below, the court will deny defendants’ motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.