Conanon

(PC) Hisle v. Conanon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20201:17-cv-01400California4,535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DENNIS CURTIS HISLE, Case No. 1:17-cv-01400-NONE-SAB-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DEFENDANT v. CONANAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST MARYLYN CONANAN, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES BE GRANTED Defendants. (ECF No. 107)

17 Plaintiff Dennis Curtis Hisle is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendant Dr. Conanan’s motion for summary judgment for 20 failure to exhaust the administrative remedies, filed on March 2, 2020. 21 I.

RELEVANT BACKGROUND

23 This action is proceeding against Defendants Dr. Marlyn Conanon (“Dr. Conanon” or 24 “Defendant Conanon”) and Dr. Mushtaq Ahmed for deliberate indifference to a serious medical 25 need in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 26 27 As previously stated, on March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.