(HC) Gonzalez Garcia v. People

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20202:20-cv-00879California626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RODRIGO A. GONZALEZ GARCIA, No. 2:20-cv-0879-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PEOPLE, Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 18, 2018, the court summarily dismissed petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus for failure to state a cognizable habeas claim pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. ECF No. 7. The order granted petitioner leave to amend within thirty days and warned petitioner that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The time for acting has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 A party’s failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.