Sherman

(HC) Avila, Jr. v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20201:18-cv-01073California877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT AVILA, JR., No. 1:18-cv-01073-NONE-JDP Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY

v. PETITION STUART SHERMAN, (Doc. No. 13) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Robert Avila, Jr., a state prisoner, brought the instant habeas petition pro se under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to challenge his state conviction for lewd or lascivious and sexual penetration upon a minor. (Doc. No. 1 at 37.) Similar habeas petitions were filed by petitioner with the California Court of Appeal and the California Supreme Court—both were denied. (Id. at 3, 36-37, 62.) As was the case with his habeas petitions filed in state court, the instant federal petition also raises the same three grounds for relief. (Id. at 6, 8-9, 36-37.) First, petitioner claims his due process rights were violated when the jury at his trial in state court was instructed that they may decide whether to draw propensity from evidence of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.