Bradley-Aboyade
Bradley-Aboyade v. Crozier
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 No. 2:19-cv-01098-TLN-AC TARYN BRADLEY-ABOYADE, an individual and successor-in-interest of Wayne Benjamin Bradley, deceased, ORDER Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 OFFICER D. CROZIER, et al., 16 Defendant.
18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants J. Austin, D. Crozier, C. Larsen. R. Salas, and T. Heng’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 19.) Defendants D. Hatch, T. Collins, G. Schopf, M. Gallegos, J. Lizarraga, and R. Gonzalez (collectively, “Defendants”) joined the Motion to Dismiss the FAC. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff Taryn Bradley-Aboyade (“Plaintiff”) opposed the Motion. (ECF No. 20.) Defendants replied. (ECF No. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action involves the death of Wayne Benjamin Bradley (“Decedent”) while he was in custody at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”). …