Lizzaraga

(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20202:18-cv-02181California7,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., No. 2:18-CV-2181-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is (1) plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery (ECF No. 47) and (2) plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 48). On March 23, 2020, plaintiff filed this motion to compel responses to his request for production of documents. On July 3, 2020, defendants submitted their opposition to plaintiff’s motion. See ECF No. 64. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / DISCUSSION

I. Motion to Compel

In his motion to compel, plaintiff references inadequate responses by defendants to requests for admissions and requests for production (RFP) of documents. See ECF No. 47, pgs. 1-3. Plaintiff does not, however, set forth any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.