Lind

(PC) Stich v. Lind

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20202:20-cv-01300California328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL STICH, No. 2:20-CV-1300-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NICKOLAS LIND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff has not made the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Specifically, plaintiff’s prison trust account statement indicates he currently has $1,344.87 on account. See ECF No. 2. Therefore, plaintiff’s declaration fails to demonstrate that he is unable to pay the filing fees. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / wOASe 2 OVE LOU AINE IVINS UC OO OPE THe Ye ove

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that plaintiffs motion for 2 leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied and that plaintiff be required to pay the 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.