Cardenas
Cardenas v. County of Tehama
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO GUDINO CARDENAS, et No. 2:18-cv-03021-TLN-DMC al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Tehama (“County”), Sheriff 18 Dave Hencratt (“Hencratt”), and Assistant Sheriff Phil Johnson’s (“Johnson”)1 (collectively, 19 “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF 20 No. 9.) Per the Court’s Order Relating Cases (ECF No. 7), the identical Motion was filed in each 21 related case. Plaintiffs in this case (No. 2:18-cv-03021-TLN-DMC), Francisco Gudino Cardenas 22 23 Plaintiffs’ Complaint alleges actions against Phil “Johnson,” however, in the related cases and in Defendants’ briefs, this individual is referred to as Phil “Johnston.” Plaintiffs will be given leave to amend this name should they discover this change was made in error. This Order will 25 refer to Phil Johnston. 26 The related cases are as follows: 2:18-cv-02916-TLN-DMC (Phommathep); 2:18-cv- 27 …