(PS) Stewart v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of Hartford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 4, 20202:17-cv-02418California977 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLLEEN STEWART, No. 2:17–cv–2418–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE CO. OF HARTFORD,

15 Defendant. 16 On June 19, 2020, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, and a hearing on this motion was ultimately set for August 13, 2020. (ECF Nos. 61, 63.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was obligated to file and serve a written opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion at least fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing date: by July 31, 2020. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing date. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question. No party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.