(PC) Curry v. California Forensic Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20202:18-cv-02513California6,759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HENRY CURRY, No. 2:18-cv-2513 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a former pretrial detainee,1 now state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Thompson and Harris is before the court. As discussed below, defendants’ motion should be granted. II. Plaintiff’s Allegations In his verified complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants Andrea Thompson, R.N. and Dr. Dawn Harris were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs by refusing to 26 Plaintiff confirms that he was extradited to the Butte County Jail for criminal proceedings in Butte County. (ECF No. 30 at 6.)

The remaining defendants were dismissed pursuant to plaintiff consent. (ECF Nos. 6, 7.) provide an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.