(PS) Binns v. American General Life and Accident Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20202:20-cv-01120California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEYRON LAMONTE BINNS, No. 2:20–cv–1120–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Binns is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On June 3, 2020, plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint against his insurance company and certain employees thereof, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The court found Plaintiff Binns satisfied Section 1915,2 screened the complaint, and found it failed to state a claim because defendants were private citizens and not liable under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 7.) The court granted leave to amend, and after an extension of time, a first

1 This case proceeds before the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

2 The complaint also references an alleged plaintiff Gentry, who also submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court did not explicitly rule on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.