Federal Trade Commission v. Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20201:20-cv-01060California6,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 1:20-cv-01060-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

GOLDEN SUNRISE NUTRACEUTICAL, ORDER INC., et al., (Doc. No. 3) Defendants.

17 This matter came before the court on August 5, 2020, for a hearing on the motion for a temporary restraining order filed on behalf of plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). (Doc. No. 3.) Attorneys Zachary Keller, Reid Tepfer, and Edward Hynes appeared via video for plaintiff, and attorney David McNamara appeared via video for defendant Stephen Meis. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order in its entirety. BACKGROUND In its complaint plaintiff alleges as follows. Defendant Golden Sunrise Nutraceutical, Inc. (“G.S. Nutraceutical”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.