Bick

(PC) Tunstall v. Bick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 5, 20202:16-cv-02604California1,177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT WILLIAM TUNSTALL, JR., No. 2:16-CV-2604-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOSEPH BICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint (ECF No. 68). 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his original complaint on November 1, 2016. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has amended this complaint four times by order of the Court. See ECF No. 26; ECF No. 31; ECF No. 571; ECF No. 68. On September 13, 2019, the Court issued an order instructing plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint due to deficiencies in plaintiff’s third amended complaint. See ECF No. 60. The Court advised plaintiff that his First Amendment access to court 27 The docket erroneously marks ECF No. 57 as plaintiff’s second amended complaint. It is plaintiff’s third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.