Hicks

(PC) Ardds v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20201:18-cv-01324California5,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DENIAL OF EX PARTE

MOTION FOR RELIEF AS MOOT

D. HICKS, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on September 21, 2018, and the matter was transferred to this Court on September 26, 2018. (ECF Nos. 1 and 3.) Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on December 11, 2018. (ECF No. 23.) On October 31, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted him leave to amend. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on December 5, 2019, along with an ex parte motion seeking an order directing the provision of his legal property. (ECF No. 32.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.