(PC) Perez v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20201:20-cv-00840California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDRO S. PEREZ, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00840-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ) THIS ORDER

A, SMITH, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN Defendants. ) CLAIMS ) ) [ECF Nos. 10, 11] ) )

Plaintiff Sandro S. Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 22, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference against Defendants A. Smith, D. Schuller, G. Nwachukwu, J. Burell, V. Giannadrea, J. Trujillo-Villa, J. Szalai, J. Alvarez, and unidentified ASP designated custody supervisor. (ECF No. 10.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.