Diaz

(PC) Chatman v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20201:20-cv-00918California835 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY ALONZO CHATMAN, No. 1:20-cv-00918-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING MOTION

v.

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND

R. DIAZ, et al., DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendants. (Doc Nos. 5, 7) 16 Plaintiff Larry Alonzo Chatman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 15, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 5) be denied and this action dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff has accrued more than three “strike” dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. No. 7.) The magistrate judge further found that plaintiff’s allegations fail to show that he is in imminent danger of serious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.