Melikian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:19-cv-1981-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT

JUDGES KENNETH J. MELIKIAN,

WARREN C. STRANCENER, THOMAS

A. SMITH, VICKI ASHWORTH, JAME

PENSE, MARK A. RALPHS, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. His declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or that the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed below,…