(PS) Tautau v. IHSS - Kern County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20202:19-cv-00600California1,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TWYLLA TAUTAU, No. 2:19-cv-600-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER KERN COUNTY I.H.S.S., RIVERSIDE

COUNTY I.H.S.S., CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

BAKERSFIELD POLICE

DEPARTMENT, KERN COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, F.B.I.,

16 Defendants.

18 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Her declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.