Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20201:12-cv-01156California2,633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS LATTIMORE, et al., (ECF No. 117) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action has a lengthy history, which the Court has summarized in prior orders and declines to set forth here. Relevant to the instant findings and recommendations, on November 5, 2018, the assigned District Judge granted Plaintiff leave to file a fifth amended complaint “limited to her claim that defendant Barron labeled her as a ‘snitch’.” (ECF No. 113, p. 4.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a fifth amended complaint on February 4, 2019. (ECF No. 116.) Plaintiff filed another fifth amended complaint on February 15,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.