Rodreguez

(PC) Harrison v. Rodreguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20201:18-cv-00525California2,193 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL HARRISON, Case No. 1:18-cv-00525-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO VACATE VOLUNTARY

v. DISMISSAL OR ENFORCE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

RODREGUEZ, et al., (Doc. 54) Defendants.

16 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the parties’ voluntary dismissal of this matter or enforce the parties’ settlement agreement. (Doc. 54.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY The parties participated in a settlement conference before the undersigned on July 10, 2019. (Doc. 48.) At the conference, the parties reached a settlement and placed the terms of their agreement on the record. (Id.) On July 12, 2019, the Court issued an order restating the terms of the settlement agreement that were placed on the record. (Doc. 49.) On August 1, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.